Managing a company is a risky mission: in a number of cases, the manager is criminally liable, even if he is not directly at the origin of the decision having led to the offence.
He can be sentenced to pecuniary sanctions, imprisonment, deprived of his civic or family rights …
Of course there is no power without responsibility, but the manager must be aware that the more he monopolises the assignment of direct powers, the more he is legally exposed. There are solutions that allow these risks to be reduced and shared, while preserving a real management role.
Our primary concern is to ensure that the manager can fully play his role as decision-maker, without being overexposed and in optimizing the firm’s efficiency.
Our answer
We assist you in all or part of the following assignments, depending on your requirements:
choice of the manager’s status, of the social mandates, the organisation of the power within the firm
setting up of delegations of powers and subdelegations to displace and share the risk
setting up and management of a system of internal and risk control procedures
setting up of internal regulations, charters … to inform the employees of the areas of risk
setting up of a good company governance
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast in the event of social problematics
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast in the event of environmental problematics
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast in the event of commercial problematics
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast in the event of financial problematics
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast in the event of accounting and tax problematics
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast as a result of inspection operations coming from various regulating bodies (including European)
defence of the manager on whom doubt is cast for faulty management
manager’s liability in the event of the firm’s failure
transfer of the firm and guarantee of assets and liabilities
To reduce his risk, the manager should firstly be aware of all the legal obligations to be complied with; he should then build the adapted internal procedures.
We recommend:
an audit of the disputes, frauds and sanctions undergone by the company over the last 24 months
an preventive audit of the practises of the main risk functions, with corrective recommendations
a training course for the executives and managers and a general sensitization of the exposed teams.